| Supraconsciousness Network |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
. . . . . . . . |
Discussion on: Examines current concepts relating matter-energy to space-time and the fundamental forces of nature as physicists are currently attempting to do; however, also interrelates intelligence-consciousness to this formulation. The "Theory of Everything" is a term originally coined by physicists to imply a general theory that beautifully and simplistically unites all current knowledge of our physical reality under one holistic description. It would merge understanding of all the known physical forces which seem to define our universal physical reality, as well as all objects contained within, extending to its outer limit. There are those physicists and cosmologists who believe this might even be achieved within the next generation. Some have devoted their professional lives to the attainment of this objective. Einstein devoted the later part of his career toward this end without success. There are those physicists who are developing superstring theory that believe a Grand Unification Theory is currently being formulated. Do the odds favor the required breakthroughs in insight for this goal to be achieved? The answer is probably yes if this theory ignores the most obvious and important part of our existence, that being the presence of intelligence and consciousness which are the most active ingredients comprising mind. However, if the latter is not included within the framework of this theory then I contend that whatever theory evolves should not be entitled to be referred to by that name. At most it might be called the "Physical Theory of Everything". To be complete a theory of everything must not omit any facet of our perceived reality. I believe that what is being presented will begin the framework for a complete and comprehensive theory encompassing both our physical and mental reality. Such a theory would have to deal with the presence of mind, thoughts and feelings and whatever part they play in the grand scheme of things. Many will challenge this work as an impossible task however I would respectfully suggest that it is not only possible but that the following text represents a strong foundation that interrelates all known concepts of our reality. The theory requires the acceptance of certain basic assumptions. There is strong scientific evidence to support most of them. These assumptions will be stated early in the discussion. If one is uncomfortable with the assumptions then they will in all probability be uncomfortable with the theories conclusions. This is the only text that I have become aware of that attempts to integrate all facets of our existence into one all-inclusive theory. This claim cannot be made if certain concepts, which have traditionally been categorized as spiritual, are excluded. By interrelating scientific, philosophical and spiritual concepts a rather complete model begins to emerge that integrates all facets of our existence. The completion of this theory will ultimately await the mathematical description, which will best be provided by physicists as they eventually fill in the details. This transcends my ability as a non-physicist with limited mathematical skills. Nevertheless it is my belief that my current understanding of both physics and mathematics is sufficient to present the following theory which will include: (a) description of the origin of the universe, (b) give greater understanding to the concept of gravity and how it operates, (c) relate the concept of a superforce that was probably present in the early moments of our universe which then evolved into our currently recognized physical forces, (d) discuss the principal of holographic distribution of information throughout all of space, ( e) include other concepts usually confined to the domain of the physicist. I would ordinarily leave the responsibility of presenting a theory of everything to the physicist, however there is little doubt that it would not include the relationship that mind and other mental constructs have to matter-energy and space-time by ignoring the presence of intelligence-consciousness. The theory will also advance the concept that the universe began as one single basic homogeneous substance with divergent properties, which allowed it to evolve into its present form with the apparent distinct entities that we recognize seemingly separately as matter-energy, space-time and intelligence-consciousness. The theory will be so bold as to suggest the presence of a creative force, which was and is one of the properties of the basic substance that permeates the universe. Most scientists would choose to deny such an entity, not so much because of disbelief, but rather because there is no way to currently test such a belief. It cannot be measured therefore it must not be considered scientific. It is my understanding that most scientists have some belief in a higher power that transcends science but so far have found no way to incorporate this concept into our physical reality. There is currently no known way to measure the presence of consciousness. Tests that have been devised to ascertain the level of human intelligence are crude at best. The presence of animal intelligence and consciousness has been largely ignored. The best that science has been able to achieve in the study of intelligence-consciousness is to suggest that it represents an epiphenomenon arising from the electro-chemical events, which are continuously occurring within the brain. This theory concludes otherwise and predicts that intelligence-consciousness will in time be recognized as being primary and not a secondary occurrence. Its presence was proactive in the development of the universe's current state of complex evolution and was present at its beginning. It is my contention that there are compelling reasons to admit to the existence of a creative force. I will submit a way to test for the presence of such a force. I believe that the test is already in progress and only needs to be recognized and interpreted. It is based upon Newton's second law," F=ma". This one concept is arguably the most important question we as humans might care to answer other than what, if anything, awaits each of us following death. By now there must be raised eyebrows because of the apparent audaciousness of such a seemingly incredible claim. Please keep an open mind and follow with me. When the “Integrated Theory of Intelligence” was first written it was considered to represent an outline of an essentially complete world view. The author was not aware of the term “Theory of Everything” at the time. Since then a further attempt is being made to blend the information contained within “Integrated Theory of Intelligence” with that being developed by the physics community. It is the author’s opinion that any “Theory of Everything”, eventually presented must be largely based upon a physical description of the universe as being developed by physicists and now cosmologists. So far, however, both disciplines have generally failed to incorporate the concepts of consciousness and intelligence into their theories preferring to subjugate them to the status of an epiphenomenon. It is my very strong belief that any theory will fail that doesn’t incorporate the concept of intelligence-consciousness as one of its primary ingredients of the universe. The “Theory of Everything” that I am presently working on is based upon the premise that there is one basic substance that permeates our universe, which manifests the properties of matter-energy, space-time, and intelligence-consciousness. These ingredients are completely interrelated and interdependent. I would suggest the acronym “MESTIC” (matter-energy-space-time-intelligence-consciousness) as a word to refer to this basic substance. If one is more spiritually oriented, one might substitute the last letter in the word energy (y) for the first letter (e) and produce the word “MYSTIC”. Since the author sees himself as a spiritually oriented scientist he favors the latter spelling. Whether one develops a worldview or Theory of Everything based upon quantum mechanics and general relativity, superstring theory or any other competing concept, the Integrated Theory of Everything works with all of them equally well. Even though the Integrated Theory of Intelligence could act as a foundation for a Theory of Everything, it ultimately will require a completed mathematical formulation developed by physicists and cosmologists liberally borrowing from all other physical and biological sciences. All fields must ultimately fit under the umbrella of the completed theory. Currently there are some scientists who are suggesting that “information” must be considered as one of the basic ingredients comprising our universe along with matter-energy and space-time. This has developed since the original formulation of the Integrated Theory of Intelligence in 1984. This comes yet one step closer to recognizing that our current physical description is incomplete and that there is more to our universe than just matter-energy and space-time. In Chapter Four I differentiate between the terms “Information” and “Intelligence”, and state that: Intelligence = (Information + Consciousness) Or Information = (Intelligence – Consciousness) In other words, the term “Intelligence” implies the presence of an active ingredient, and the term “Information” implies a more sterile, inactive entity. In either case the mathematical relationships that are suggested in the Integrated Theory of Intelligence relating “Intelligence” to matter, energy, space, and time work equally well if the word “Information” is substituted. If one is convinced that there is no higher power and that consciousness is simply an epiphenomenon created by the electrochemical events, which are occurring within the brain, then one could still use the acronym “MESTI” (matter-energy-space-time-information). It is my strong belief that trying to plug the hole in a Theory of Everything using only “information” as the added ingredient will still ultimately fail. I again respectfully suggest that it will eventually be recognized that there is one basic ingredient that comprises our universe and it has the properties of matter-energy, space-time, and intelligence-consciousness. Before dealing with specifics of the theory it is important to state any assumptions that are being made. If any of these are proven erroneous then the theory would require modification. Most of the assumptions would appear to be based upon relatively strong scientific evidence. They are listed as follows:
|